Worst Call by a Ref You’ll See in a While

By Brett Robbins • on November 19, 2009

Detroit lost last night against Dallas 1-3 in a game where special teams made all the difference.  Despite the Red Wings recent success on the power play and penalty kill, they went 0 for 4 on the power play and allowed 2 short-handed goals.

Unfortunately this game was all but ruined by a not even “controversial” called-off goal in the Third Period that would have tied the game at 2-2.  It was blatantly and obviously a botched call, perhaps the worst I have seen since instant replay became available.   Here’s the clip of it in case you missed it:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nZpCHtQYYI&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]

“It was a goal,” Mike Babcock said. “I know what the league said, it’s non-reviewable.  The guy never meant to blow the whistle, it was a shot.  It was in on the shot.  It’s as dumb as I’ve ever seen.”

The puck is shot from Brad May and goes directly in, without any question.  Now, the call on the ice was completely understandable because everyone on the ice with the exception of Brad May and Dallas goaltender Alex Auld lost sight of the puck when it was pressed up against the inside of the net by Auld’s pad.  The office in Toronto reviews all goals in the NHL for moments exactly like this, and they regularly overturn called goals when the puck was high-sticked or kicked in, and they regularly count goals that went in the bet without the refs seeing it.  For this reason, because they have instant replay, they got rid of the goal line judge.

Except if a ref claims he “intended” to call the whistle before the puck was actually in the net, all bets are off and the office in Toronto and the instant replay is not even considered.  The referee in question, Dennis LaRue, also happens to be the ref who allowed Pittsburgh to have 6 men on the ice for over 20 seconds in last year’s Stanley Cup Finals.

The intent of the rule is fair, but every year numerous mistakes are made because of it, including in the playoffs, like the Marian Hossa called off goal against Anaheim in the Western Conference Finals last year or the numerous called-off goals from phantom goalie interference on Holmstrom.  The same thing happened this year where instant replay showed a legitimate goal from Tod Bertuzzi was called off because the ref “intended” to call the play dead earlier, having lost sight of it.  And this is only the Red Wings, as this type of thing happens across the league to other teams as well.  It is a big problem.

What makes this one so unique, and even more egregious is the fact that the only time the ref could have possibly lost sight of the puck was when it was already in the net.  He blew the whistle a full 3 seconds after the goal was scored, and with instant replay they could have easily rectified the situation and counted the goal.  Except the ref stuck to the story of “intending” to blow the whistle earlier.

And just when was that?  When May was shooting the puck?  Or during the split second after it was shot and before it went directly into the net?  Ok, why on earth would you call that play dead?  You’d like to think there was at least some accountability from the refs in this league.

The NHL can already overturn the on-ice ref in numerous situations, as they are fallible human beings, but to not even review a play as blatantly obvious as this is just a joke.

The sad thing is, the answer is simple and obvious.  Simply use the tools you have available to review every goal and between the refs and Toronto, make the best call.  The NHL’s official response is that “They can not review every play, or the game would take too long” which completely ignores that we are talking about actual goals, not “every single play”.  They already review all goals, and in 90% of these situations can overturn and correct the on-ice ref’s ruling, just not in this specific instance where he “intended” to blow the whistle earlier.

If the league can institute the “Avery Rule” in the middle of the season, you would think they could make a simple rule change to allow instant replay to be used in all goals, since they are already reviewed in the first place.  It does not take an over-haul of the NHL to rectify this problem.

Leave a Comment

:alien: :monkey: :angry: :arrow: :bandit: :bat: :beer: :biggrin: :borg: :bulb: :camera: :cat: :cat2: :chicken: :clap: :clock: :clover: :cuckoo: :dog: :dog2: :ninja: :doh: :dont: :drink: :flag: :sick: :gift: :cop: :helmet: :mad: :mrt: :nervous: :peace: :pirate: :poop: :whistle: :rockon: :rolling: :shake: :shiftyeyes: :sigh: :skull: :smug: :surprise: :thumbdown: :thumbup: :timeout: :turtle: :tv: :wait: :wave: :whoa: :wits: :worthy: :halo: :rolling_eyes: :love: :no_talking: :silly: :confused: :yawn:

Comments

Jeff

By Jeff on December 10th, 2009 at 4:37 pm   (Quote)

I’m still pissed about that call, just awful. And people wonder why this league is considered a joke. The Wings do need to step it up though. I know there are injuries (alot of them) but we at least have the keep pace if we are going to make a run for it when Franzen and Filpula come back.

Total Comments by Jeff: 13

zack shea

By zack shea on November 30th, 2009 at 6:08 am   (Quote)

very well put. i challenge fans of teams other than the Wings to bring up any such goal that has been disallowed due to this ridiculous “intent to blow the whistle rule”…i’m sure this must have happened to other teams also, right? let’s bring all this ugliness into the light…

Total Comment by zack shea: 1

Barry Cobbley

By Barry Cobbley on November 20th, 2009 at 6:07 am   (Quote)

Absolutely agree, this rule is ridiculous and needs to go…ASAP. NHL should also send a message by suspending the crew for at least a few games. For the sake of the game they need to get these calls RIGHT.

Total Comment by Barry Cobbley: 1

brobbins

By Brett Robbins on November 19th, 2009 at 6:48 pm   (Quote)

Ken Williams: Wow! And I thought the refs have been making some bad calls against the Ducks recently. The “intent to blow” rule is just dumb, especially in this case. Nothing had previously happened that would even warrant a whistle.

Maybe the ref simply refused to believe Brad May could score a goal? :alien:

kwilliams

By Ken Williams on November 19th, 2009 at 6:23 pm   (Quote)

Wow! And I thought the refs have been making some bad calls against the Ducks recently. The “intent to blow” rule is just dumb, especially in this case. Nothing had previously happened that would even warrant a whistle.

Total Comments by Ken Williams: 3

jprphoto09

By jprphoto09 on November 19th, 2009 at 5:25 pm   (Quote)

If they “intended” to blow the whistle, and then the replay shows that it was a goal anyway, than it doesn’t matter
if they intended to blow the whistle anymore because the replay shows that they shouldn’t have blown it even if they intended to. Where is the logic! This is easy to understand! I won’t be suprised if the NHL’s fanbase starts declining, if it isn’t already.
This is PATHETIC!

Total Comment by jprphoto09: 1

brobbins

By Brett Robbins on November 19th, 2009 at 4:12 pm   (Quote)

The “intent to blow” rule is to protect the goaltenders in the event that the goalie has a covered puck while players from the opposing team are hacking and whacking at him with their sticks — fine, I can understand that, they should be able to call off a goal if the goalie had established control but they simply could not get the whistle to their mouth in time to call it dead.

But only someone recovering from a stroke would take so long to blow a whistle in some of the instances we are now seeing, and it is essentially being used as a “get out of jail card free” by some of these refs — Made a mistake? Just say you “intended” to call earlier and you won’t be called on it.

Just give Toronto the ability to make the right call on goals, like they already do in 90% of these situations.

lemel

By Jason Lemel on November 19th, 2009 at 4:01 pm   (Quote)

I don’t like that whole “intent to blow” rule. How can they say they meant to blow it earlier? Or when they don’t blow it, they can say “I wanted to but I just didn’t.” They have to get rid of it. You can’t say you meant to do it. If you meant to, you would have done it. Plain and simple

Total Comments by Jason Lemel: 4

brobbins

By Brett Robbins on November 19th, 2009 at 3:30 pm   (Quote)

Refs make mistakes, and I absolutely agree every call or non-call on every play should not be held up to review — but this specific problem on called-off goals, which happens quite a bit, is nearly 100% correctable.

100% of all goals are already reviewed by the War Room in Toronto, and in cases of a high-stick, goalie interference or a kicked in puck – the ref’s on-ice call can be overturned to ensure the proper outcome. A missed goal by the refs can also be corrected, upon review, so that the goal is counted.

The NHL can really crack me up — they can turn around and invent a new rule out of thin air immediately after Sean Avery waves his glove in the face of Martin Brodeur, but after years of botched calls, because a ref states he “intended” to call the whistle earlier, Gary Bettman lets us know “It might be a topic of conversation at the next GM’s Meeting”.

lemel

By Jason Lemel on November 19th, 2009 at 3:10 pm   (Quote)

Nobody is perfect, but the fact is that they have the technology available to make the right call. I usually don’t get on refs too much because everybody is human but they looked at the replay and it’s very obvious that the puck was in there. Just another missed call. You have to suck it up and hope they don’t make the same mistakes again, although this season they’re doing it much more than previous years. At least it seems that way to me

Total Comments by Jason Lemel: 4

diamond

By Lou Diamond on November 19th, 2009 at 2:23 pm   (Quote)

That video showed that the refs have the ability to make the right call.. But its been a bad year for refs in all sports this yr.. Its part of the game, ya just have to hope ya have more in your favor then against.. Still a tuff break..

Total Comments by Lou Diamond: 275

brobbins

By Brett Robbins on November 19th, 2009 at 1:21 pm   (Quote)

They happen too often, whether it is two Western Conference teams vying for a playoff spot where 1 point could make all the difference like this one, or in playoff games where a single goal can change the outcome of an entire Series. These things happen, but what is infuriating is that they already have the tools in place to simply rectify it (and actually do so in most instances) — instant replay.

Here is a case from only a month ago where the right call was made and Toronto over-turned a waived-off goal from a ref who had lost sight of the puck (at about 2:45 into the clip):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4UuQiLjMp0&feature=player_embedded

It is simply asinine to not ensure the right call is made on goals, especially when the process and tools are already in place to do so.

diamond

By Lou Diamond on November 19th, 2009 at 1:14 pm   (Quote)

These things happen.. and I’m not overly disappointed it happened to the Wings.. Lookin forward to that Jan 2 game and what ya have to say then.. good write up man.. :thumbup:

Total Comments by Lou Diamond: 275